The president is not our teacher, our tutor, our guide or ruler. He does not command us, we command him. We serve neither him nor his vision. It is not his job or his prerogative to redefine custom, law and beliefs; to appropriate industries; to seize the country, as it were, by the shoulders or by the throat so as to impose by force of theatrical charisma his justice upon 300 million others. It is neither his job nor his prerogative to shift the power of decision away from them, and to him and the acolytes of his choosing.~ Mike Pence 9/20/10
See it All:
We know what it is not. Now we need to define what it is.
Showing posts with label despots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label despots. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Friday, August 6, 2010
They Know Not What They Support
Homosexuals and anyone else that celebrates this recent ruling in CA have no idea what a beast they have unleashed, one that will happily eat friend or foe.
We must be very careful not to discuss this in any terms that mask what it truly is; a usurpation of the sovereign power of the state and the people in it to order their lives as they see fit.
A federal judge has no jurisdiction at all when it comes to a State's constitution! If California had a man for Governor and an AG who believed in the rule of law this would never have happened.
Talk about a slippery slope. What's to keep someone else from looking to nullify other parts of the CA Constitution from filing suit and getting this less-than-legal mind to rule in their favor?
Like this gem.
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SEC. 4. Free exercise and enjoyment of religion without
discrimination or preference are guaranteed. .... A person is not incompetent to be a witness or juror because of
his or her opinions on religious beliefs.////
This so-called judge has already written of his disdain for tradition and traditional beliefs. It is not a stretch to see him ruling that only atheists can be on juries.
Why have constitutions at all? If one man can nullify part of one why not the whole thing?
We must be very careful not to discuss this in any terms that mask what it truly is; a usurpation of the sovereign power of the state and the people in it to order their lives as they see fit.
A federal judge has no jurisdiction at all when it comes to a State's constitution! If California had a man for Governor and an AG who believed in the rule of law this would never have happened.
Talk about a slippery slope. What's to keep someone else from looking to nullify other parts of the CA Constitution from filing suit and getting this less-than-legal mind to rule in their favor?
Like this gem.
CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
ARTICLE 1 DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
SEC. 4. Free exercise and enjoyment of religion without
discrimination or preference are guaranteed. .... A person is not incompetent to be a witness or juror because of
his or her opinions on religious beliefs.////
This so-called judge has already written of his disdain for tradition and traditional beliefs. It is not a stretch to see him ruling that only atheists can be on juries.
Why have constitutions at all? If one man can nullify part of one why not the whole thing?
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
...end of the beginning. We can only hope.
It is really unpleasant to admit to yourself that this fraud has taken place. I remember when I finally accepted the reality that we have an active usurpation of the presidency going on. I don't blame people for not wanting to admit it; it is painful.
The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Owhatever, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. The Obots who worship this poser without a past are the real problem. Where did they come from? How did they come to hate this country so deeply? How do they function as adults without even basic curiosity or critical thinking?
Then there are the people in front of the facade who gleefully participated this usurpation and the crooks behind the facade who really pulled this off. I do wonder why him? Why did they need a third world punk to be the tip of the spear for this evil plan? So many questions so few answers.
To paraphrase Churchill: "Proving him to be a fraud is not the end or even the beginning of the end but merely the end of the beginning".
The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Owhatever, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. The Obots who worship this poser without a past are the real problem. Where did they come from? How did they come to hate this country so deeply? How do they function as adults without even basic curiosity or critical thinking?
Then there are the people in front of the facade who gleefully participated this usurpation and the crooks behind the facade who really pulled this off. I do wonder why him? Why did they need a third world punk to be the tip of the spear for this evil plan? So many questions so few answers.
To paraphrase Churchill: "Proving him to be a fraud is not the end or even the beginning of the end but merely the end of the beginning".
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Despots do what despots do
The Fraud wants a "civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded as the United States military".
What kind of person embraces an idea like that?
A despot.
It's a BAD IDEA that only a despot would embrace.
I can think of no example of liberty loving people desiring to have such a "force" at their disposal like the one proposed by the usurper.
He essentially wants an army with their guns pointed in toward the citizens of the United States. Does that really sound like a good idea?
So if someone is evil enough to desire that much power and control over others why would he not lie to get what he wants? Other like-minded despots were/are liars, cheats and murderers. Common traits with their type.
Is this really that hard to grasp?
What kind of person embraces an idea like that?
A despot.
It's a BAD IDEA that only a despot would embrace.
I can think of no example of liberty loving people desiring to have such a "force" at their disposal like the one proposed by the usurper.
He essentially wants an army with their guns pointed in toward the citizens of the United States. Does that really sound like a good idea?
So if someone is evil enough to desire that much power and control over others why would he not lie to get what he wants? Other like-minded despots were/are liars, cheats and murderers. Common traits with their type.
Is this really that hard to grasp?
Thursday, June 18, 2009
History Calls
Through combination of legislative and executive power, Hitler's government suppressed political opposition. On 14 July, the Nazi Party was declared the only legal party in Germany. Labor unions were merged with employers' federations into an organization under Nazi control, and the traditional autonomy of German state governments was abolished.
Having secured supreme political power, Hitler went on to gain public support by convincing most Germans he was their savior from the economic Depression. The Nazis continued eliminated opposition through a process known as Gleichschaltung ("bringing into line").
Sound familiar?
Labels:
despots,
doomed to repeat history,
history,
tea parties
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
